2 awards, 37.1 million manats, one supplier — a second concentration signal at Shusha reserve administration
AZTender's 30 October 2026 data cut shows Shusha City State Reserve Administration awarding Diler Insaat CJSC two contracts worth 37,060,601.25 AZN, published 52 seconds apart — the buyer's second single-supplier signal in 2026.
AZTender's data cut of 30 October 2026 shows Shusha City State Reserve Administration ("ŞUŞA ŞƏHƏRİ DÖVLƏT QORUĞU İDARƏSİ" PUBLİK HÜQUQİ ŞƏXSİ) recording two award results for a single supplier, Diler Insaat CJSC ("DİLER İNŞAAT" QAPALI SƏHMDAR CƏMİYYƏTİ), worth a combined 37,060,601.25 AZN (≈37.1 million manats), published 52 seconds apart on the evening of 15 May 2026, and both converted to registered contracts on the same date, 3 June 2026.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Shusha City State Reserve Administration ("ŞUŞA ŞƏHƏRİ DÖVLƏT QORUĞU İDARƏSİ" PUBLİK HÜQUQİ ŞƏXSİ) |
| Supplier | Diler Insaat CJSC ("DİLER İNŞAAT" QAPALI SƏHMDAR CƏMİYYƏTİ) |
| Award 1 | 12,984,241.14 AZN, published 15 May 2026, 18:01:08 UTC |
| Award 2 | 24,076,360.11 AZN, published 15 May 2026, 18:00:16 UTC |
| Combined total (deduplicated) | 37,060,601.25 AZN (≈37.1 million) |
| Contract date, both awards | 3 June 2026 |
What the number is not
Both rows carry a registered contract date, but AZTender does not track execution or disbursement after signing, so 37.1 million manats is not a payment or completion figure. It is not a bidder-count or competition claim, since Azerbaijan's open procurement data carries no reliable bidder counts. It is not a finding of wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing — two awards reaching the registry 52 seconds apart, from one buyer to one supplier, can reflect an ordinary multi-lot programme processed in a single batch. The match is by registry name string, not tax ID. It is also the buyer's second published concentration signal in 2026: a 3 October 2026 article recorded three award results worth 3,727,619.27 AZN to a different supplier, AQROMAN LLC, over four weeks in July–August — noted here, not added to this total.
Why it is a signal
- Why did two award results for the same supplier post to the registry 52 seconds apart?
- What distinct scopes of work do the two awards cover, and could they be one procurement split into two records?
- Across 2026, what share of this buyer's reconstruction-related awards go to Diler Insaat CJSC and AQROMAN LLC combined?
- Will both result records convert into executed, paid work, and on what timeline?
- What procedure type governs each award, and does either carry the "Bir mənbə" (single-source) tag?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity-report module pulls every result and contract record tied to one buyer in chronological order, which is how two awards landing 52 seconds apart surface as a single-batch pattern rather than two unrelated entries. Set against the Qənaət procurer-control module, the same buyer's year-to-date history also shows a second supplier, AQROMAN LLC, receiving separate awards months apart — a comparison a bidder or auditor can run directly at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. Two award results reaching the registry seconds apart, from one buyer to one supplier, can have an ordinary administrative explanation, and no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing is drawn here.
