3 award records, 5.82 million manats, one supplier — a concentration signal at Azerbaijan's IDP committee
AZTender's data cut of 30 October 2026 shows Azerbaijan's refugee and IDP affairs committee recording three award records for Yuk Taksisi.az LLC worth 5,815,205.20 AZN, published 15 September-23 October 2026.
AZTender's data cut of 30 October 2026 shows a single buyer, Azerbaijan's State Committee for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons' Affairs ("AZƏRBAYCAN RESPUBLİKASI QAÇQINLARIN VƏ MƏCBURİ KÖÇKÜNLƏRİN İŞLƏRİ ÜZRƏ DÖVLƏT KOMİTƏSİ"), recording three award records for a single supplier, Yuk Taksisi.az LLC ("YÜK TAKSİSİ.AZ" Məhdud Məsuliyyətli Cəmiyyəti), worth 5,815,205.20 AZN combined, published between 15 September and 23 October 2026 — the most recent award just seven days before this data cut.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | State Committee for Refugees and IDPs' Affairs ("AZƏRBAYCAN RESPUBLİKASI QAÇQINLARIN VƏ MƏCBURİ KÖÇKÜNLƏRİN İŞLƏRİ ÜZRƏ DÖVLƏT KOMİTƏSİ") |
| Supplier | Yuk Taksisi.az LLC ("YÜK TAKSİSİ.AZ" Məhdud Məsuliyyətli Cəmiyyəti) |
| Awards | 3 award records in six weeks |
| Combined total | 5,815,205.20 AZN |
| Largest single award | 2,543,796.80 AZN, published 23 October 2026 (relocation to Agdam city and the villages of Garvand and Eyvazkhanbeyli) |
| Window | 15 September – 23 October 2026 |
What the number is not
The 5.82 million figure sums three deduplicated award records — 1,503,756.60 AZN (15 September 2026), 1,767,651.80 AZN (9 October 2026) and 2,543,796.80 AZN (23 October 2026), all for relocating families under the "Great Return" (Böyük Qayıdış) resettlement programme — not three signed contracts or money paid. None of the three rows carries a contract date in the registry data behind this cut; all three are result/announcement records. Relocation logistics for a stated government resettlement programme is a recurring, budgeted activity, so three awards to the same contractor inside six weeks can be an ordinary pattern. There is no bidder-count or competition claim, and no finding of wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing is made.
Why it is a signal
- How many bidders took part in each of the three procedures, and did the same firms compete each time?
- Do the three relocation awards belong to one coordinated resettlement schedule, or are they separate procurements that happen to share a buyer and a supplier?
- Will any of the three result records convert into a signed, registered contract, and on what timeline?
- Has the committee engaged other logistics suppliers for comparable relocation work in the same period?
- Does the pace of these awards track the pace of family relocations under the Great Return programme?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity-report module links every result and contract record naming a buyer or a supplier, which is how three relocation awards published over a five-week span surface as one buyer-scoped history at the State Committee for Refugees and IDPs' Affairs rather than three unconnected registry entries. The same view flags which records still lack a matching contract entry — the distinction behind the total above. A journalist tracking resettlement-programme procurement, or an auditor screening buyers for supplier concentration, can pull that history at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. Three award records to one logistics supplier inside six weeks can have an ordinary administrative explanation, such as a phased resettlement schedule, and no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing is drawn here.
