34.4 million manats, one award, two duplicate rows — Sea Breeze Construction's Qubadlı housing contract
AZTender's data cut of 25 September 2026 shows one verified 34,412,372.80 AZN construction award to Sea Breeze Construction LLC, not the doubled 68,824,745.60 AZN a raw scan first showed. A signal, not a verdict.
AZTender's data cut of 25 September 2026 shows a single, verified 34,412,372.80 AZN construction award for a residential quarter in Qubadlı, made by the Reconstruction, Construction and Management Service for Jabrayil, Gubadli and Zangilan Districts (“CƏBRAYIL, QUBADLI VƏ ZƏNGİLAN RAYONLARINDA BƏRPA, TİKİNTİ VƏ İDARƏETMƏ XİDMƏTİ” PUBLİK HÜQUQİ ŞƏXSİ) to Sea Breeze Construction LLC (“SEA BREEZE CONSTRUCTİON” Məhdud Məsuliyyətli Cəmiyyəti). A first pass over the same registry data had doubled this to 68,824,745.60 AZN by counting an announcement row and a contract row for the same award as two separate entries; the figure below is the one distinct award.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Reconstruction, Construction and Management Service for Jabrayil, Gubadli and Zangilan Districts (“CƏBRAYIL, QUBADLI VƏ ZƏNGİLAN RAYONLARINDA BƏRPA, TİKİNTİ VƏ İDARƏETMƏ XİDMƏTİ” PUBLİK HÜQUQİ ŞƏXSİ) |
| Supplier | Sea Breeze Construction LLC (“SEA BREEZE CONSTRUCTİON” Məhdud Məsuliyyətli Cəmiyyəti) |
| Tender | Residential-quarter construction and installation works, Qubadlı city (Qubadlı şəhərində yaşayış məhəlləsinin tikinti-quraşdırma işləri) |
| Award amount | 34,412,372.80 AZN |
| Announcement published | 29 April 2026 |
| Contract dated | 19 May 2026 |
What the number is not
This is not two separate 34.4 million manat awards to the same supplier: it is one construction contract that surfaces twice in the registry data, once as a result/announcement record and once as the matching contract record, both carrying the identical amount and the identical title. Nothing here shows the sum was paid twice, and a duplicate row of this kind is not evidence of wrongdoing — it reflects how the registry's announcement stream and its contract-registration stream both carry the award amount for the same procurement.
Why it is a signal
- Did the 34,412,372.80 AZN award, registered as a contract on 19 May 2026, convert into work completed and payment made as recorded?
- What qualification criteria did the buyer publish for a residential-construction contract of this size?
- How often does this same announcement-and-contract duplication recur across other awards made by reconstruction and management agencies for the liberated territories?
- Is a single award of this scale typical of this buyer's past procurement, or unusual against its other contracts?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity reports link an award's announcement row and its contract row into one record, so a duplicate pair like this one appears as a correction rather than a doubled total. A bidder assessing reconstruction-sector opportunities, or an auditor and journalist tracing one buyer's award history, can pull that reconciled record at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. No conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing is drawn from this award or from the duplicate-row pattern.
