36.2 million manats, 29 buyers, 109 awards — a fresh laptop award inside Bestcomp Group's pattern
AZTender's data cut of 13 November 2026 shows a fresh 36,199,473.60 AZN laptop award to Bestcomp Group sitting inside a 29-buyer, 109-award, 326,871,863.47 AZN lifetime pattern since 2021.
AZTender's data cut of 13 November 2026 records a fresh award of 36,199,473.60 AZN to Bestcomp Group ("BESTCOMP GROUP" Qapalı Səhmdar Cəmiyyəti) for "Noutbukların satınalınması" (purchase of laptops), published 13 October 2026 by the capital-construction and supply department (Təsərrüfat Hesablı Əsaslı Tikinti və Təchizat İdarəsi) of Azerbaijan's Ministry of Education (Təhsil Nazirliyi). The same cut places that award inside a lifetime pattern recorded for the supplier since December 2021: 29 distinct buyers, 109 awards, 326,871,863.47 AZN.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Fresh award (published 13 Oct 2026) | 36,199,473.60 AZN — laptop purchase, Ministry of Education capital-construction unit |
| Second fresh award (published 6 Nov 2026) | 113,954.96 AZN — Azerbaijan's State Statistics Committee (Dövlət Statistika Komitəsi) |
| 60-day combined | 2 buyers, 2 awards, 36,313,428.56 AZN |
| Lifetime (since Dec 2021) | 29 buyers, 109 awards, 326,871,863.47 AZN |
| Contract-dated rows in that lifetime total | 52 of 109; the remaining 57 are result records only |
What the number is not
The 326.9 million AZN lifetime figure is a sum of result records, not a tally of signed or paid contracts: 57 of the 109 rows carry no contract date, only a result-record publication date. Neither total reflects bidder counts or competition levels, which Azerbaijan's open procurement data does not publish. The grouping uses the exact registry name string, not a tax-ID (VÖEN) match, so the figures could in principle miss or merge a differently spelled entry. A 29-buyer, 4.5-year spread at one IT and equipment supplier is, on its own, an ordinary feature of a concentrated supply market, not a finding of wrongdoing, overpricing or affiliation.
Why it is a signal
- How many of the 29 buyers ran a competitive, multi-bidder procedure for their award, and how many used a single-source procedure?
- What share of the 57 undated result records later received a signed contract date, beyond the 52 already dated?
- What specification document underlies the Ministry of Education's 36.2 million AZN laptop award, and was it split into lots?
- Does the State Statistics Committee's 113,954.96 AZN award on 6 November mark a new buyer relationship for Bestcomp Group or a repeat one?
- How does a 326.9 million AZN spread across 29 buyers compare with other suppliers active in the same equipment category over the same years?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity-report module aggregates every result record for a given supplier name across buyers and years, flagging which rows carry a contract date and which remain result-record only — the split this article relies on for Bestcomp Group's 109 awards. A bidder preparing a competing equipment bid, or an auditor reviewing a ministry's supplier list, can pull the same buyer-by-buyer breakdown instead of rebuilding it from individual award pages, at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. A 29-buyer, 326.9 million AZN pattern spread across 4.5 years can have an entirely ordinary explanation, and no conclusion about wrongdoing, overpricing or affiliation is drawn here.
