9.2 million manats, one tender, largest 24-hour announcement — a familiar buyer, a new subject
AZTender's data cut of 9 October 2026 shows a 9,199,909.33 AZN (~9.2 million) Baku tender for sidewalk and park redesign documentation — the largest fresh announcement in 24 hours, from a buyer with one unrelated prior post on this site.
AZTender's data cut of 9 October 2026 shows the single largest-value tender published on Azerbaijan's state portal in the preceding 24 hours: 9,199,909.33 AZN (~9.2 million), tender No. 359973, for continuing design-estimate documentation on landscaping and reconstruction of Baku's sidewalks, courtyards, parks and gardens. The buyer, Baku City Capital Construction and Repair LLC ("BAKI ŞƏHƏR ƏSASLI TİKİNTİ VƏ TƏMİR" MƏHDUD MƏSULİYYƏTLİ CƏMİYYƏTİ), has one earlier, unrelated post on this site.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Tender | No. 359973, continuation of design-estimate documentation for landscaping/reconstruction on Baku sidewalks, courtyards, parks and gardens |
| Buyer | Baku City Capital Construction and Repair LLC ("BAKI ŞƏHƏR ƏSASLI TİKİNTİ VƏ TƏMİR" MƏHDUD MƏSULİYYƏTLİ CƏMİYYƏTİ) |
| Estimated value | 9,199,909.33 AZN (~9.2 million) |
| Published / submission deadline | 8 October 2026 / 5 November 2026 (registry timestamps; see note below) |
| Buyer's prior posts on this site | 1 (14 September 2026, different supplier, different tender IDs, April–August 2026 awards) |
What the number is not
9,199,909.33 AZN is the buyer's estimated ceiling, not an awarded amount and not money paid — no winner exists yet. The registry's procedure-type field is blank, so this is one open tender, not a single-source or concentration signal. Registry timestamps carry a documented offset of roughly four hours from true Baku time, so no exact clock time is quoted here. The buyer's one earlier post on this site involved a different supplier and different award records from April–August 2026, unrelated to this tender.
Why it is a signal
- What does the 9.2 million manat estimate cover, and how does it relate to this buyer's earlier landscaping work already on record?
- Is this a genuinely new tender, or a follow-on phase connected to the buyer's prior four-award history?
- Why is the registry's procedure-type field blank, and how will that affect this tender's eventual classification?
- Given the roughly four-hour timestamp offset, what is the true submission deadline, and have bidders confirmed it against the official portal?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity-report module builds a running profile for every buyer from its first posting onward, so a second, unrelated tender attaches to the same buyer record as its earlier award history rather than appearing as an isolated line. A bidder, auditor or journalist tracking how a buyer's procurement footprint grows over time can pull that entity report instead of rebuilding it from the portal. More detail is available at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. A single large tender from a buyer already on record can have an entirely ordinary explanation — a design-documentation programme reaching its next phase — and no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing is drawn here.
