24 procedures, 0% single-source, 12.57 million manats to one supplier — a buyer profile for Azerishiq
AZTender's 90-day buyer profile shows Azerishiq OJSC recording 24 classified procedures with 0.0% tagged single-source, while Rusnur Construction LLC won three awards worth 12,570,929.99 AZN in the same window.
AZTender's 90-day buyer profile, dated 24 September 2026, shows Azerishiq OJSC ("AZƏRİŞIQ" ASC) recording 24 classified procedures with zero tagged "Bir mənbə" (single-source) — 0.0% — in the same window where a single supplier, Rusnur Construction LLC ("RUSNUR CONSTRUCTİON" MMC), accounts for three awards worth a combined 12,570,929.99 AZN.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Azerishiq OJSC ("AZƏRİŞIQ" ASC) |
| Window | Last 90 days (data cut 24 September 2026) |
| Classified procedures | 24 |
| Tagged "Bir mənbə" (single-source) | 0 |
| Single-source share | 0.0% |
| Supplier with most awards in the window | Rusnur Construction LLC, 3 awards, 12,570,929.99 AZN |
What the number is not
A 0.0% single-source share among classified procedures is not a claim that Azerishiq's procurement carries no concentration: the same 90-day window records three separate awards to Rusnur Construction worth 12,570,929.99 AZN, a repeat-supplier pattern that exists independently of the procedure-type tag. The 0.0% figure is also a share of classified rows only — the registry's procedure-type tag is blank on an unknown share of Azerishiq's remaining records in this window, not separately measured here. Nor is this a bidder-count or competition-level metric; Azerbaijan's open procurement data does not publish bidder counts.
Why it is a signal
- What explains three separate awards to Rusnur Construction landing inside a four-week span in a profile that carries no single-source tags at all?
- What procedure type is recorded for the majority of Azerishiq's 24 classified procedures, if not single-source?
- How does the untagged share of Azerishiq's remaining 90-day records compare with the classified share used here?
- Do the other high-value suppliers in the window — Harmony Industrial Construction and Engineering Group LLC ("HARMONY İNDUSTRİAL CONSTRUCTİON AND ENGİNEERİNG GROUP" MMC), Meqaplus (MEQAPLUS FİRMASI) and YUQ Construction LLC ("YUQ CONSTRUCTİON" MMC) — each represent one award, or a pattern spread over more procedures?
- Did any of the 24 classified procedures follow an earlier procedure that produced no qualifying bids?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's procurer control module (Qənaət) builds this kind of 90-day buyer profile for any procuring entity, breaking down the mix of tender types and surfacing which suppliers concentrate award value even when no procedure in the window carries a single-source tag. A bidder assessing where competition at a given buyer looks thin, or an auditor screening buyers for supplier concentration, can pull the same profile at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. A 0.0% single-source share and a repeat-supplier pattern appearing in the same buyer profile are not, by themselves, evidence of wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing, and no such conclusion is drawn here.
