18 awards, 53.2 million manats, 9 buyers — a concentration signal in AS-Təmir Tikinti LLC's award history
AZTender's data cut of 14 November 2026 shows AS-Təmir Tikinti LLC with 18 award records across 9 buyers worth 53.16m AZN since 2019, the newest a 5.6m AZN school-building award on 12 November.
AZTender's data cut of 14 November 2026, taken at 03:10 UTC, shows a construction contractor, AS-Təmir Tikinti LLC ("AS-TƏMİR TİKİNTİ" Məhdud Məsuliyyətli Cəmiyyəti), recording 18 award records across 9 distinct buyers, worth 53,163,662.72 AZN (≈53.2 million manats) combined since 2019. The newest and largest record, published 12 November 2026, is a 5,603,000.04 AZN (≈5.6 million manats) award from the Ministry of Education's capital-construction and supply department (Azərbaycan Respublikası Təhsil Nazirliyinin Təsərrüfat Hesablı Əsaslı Tikinti və Təchizat İdarəsi), for installing 11 modular school buildings nationwide.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Supplier | AS-Təmir Tikinti LLC ("AS-TƏMİR TİKİNTİ" MMC) |
| Lifetime award records | 18, across 9 distinct buyers, 2019-10-18 to 2026-11-12 |
| Lifetime combined total | 53,163,662.72 AZN |
| Fresh award | 5,603,000.04 AZN, published 12 November 2026 |
| Fresh award buyer | Ministry of Education's capital-construction and supply department |
| Fresh award scope | Installation of 11 modular school buildings nationwide |
What the number is not
The 53.2 million figure sums 18 result records, not 18 signed or paid contracts: 13 of the 18 rows carry no matching contract date, so most of this history is award announcements, not confirmed signed or disbursed agreements. Nine buyers engaging one contractor over six years is not, by itself, evidence of favouritism — it is also the spread an ordinary repeat regional contractor would show. The figure carries no bidder-count or competition claim, since Azerbaijan's open procurement data does not publish participant counts, and no claim that the nine buyer names are nine distinct legal entities, since the registry has not been checked against alias records for duplicates here.
Why it is a signal
- Which of the 18 records will go on to carry a matching, dated contract, and which stay as result records only?
- How does the capital-construction department's engagement with this supplier compare with its engagement with other contractors over the same period?
- What procedure type governed the fresh 5.6 million manat modular-schools award?
- Is the nine-buyer spread concentrated in one sector, or genuinely cross-sectoral?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity-report module tracks every award record a supplier carries across every buyer that names it, which is how 18 records scattered over six years and nine buyers surface as one supplier-scoped history rather than nine unconnected entries. The same view flags which records still lack a matching contract date. A bidder benchmarking a competitor's buyer reach, or an auditor and journalist screening suppliers for cross-buyer concentration, can pull that history at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. Eighteen award records to one supplier across nine buyers over six years can have an ordinary explanation, such as a capable regional contractor winning open competitions repeatedly, and no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing is drawn here.
