6 procedures, 3 single-source, 50.0% — a buyer profile for Azerbaijan's National Anti-Doping Agency
AZTender's 90-day buyer profile shows 3 of 6 procedures (50.0%) at Azerbaijan's National Anti-Doping Agency tagged "Bir mənbə" (single-source), worth 404,818 AZN combined — a small-sample reading, not a conclusion about the agency.
In AZTender's 90-day buyer profile, data cut dated 26 September 2026, the Azerbaijan National Anti-Doping Agency (Azərbaycan Milli Antidopinq Agentliyi Publik Hüquqi Şəxs) recorded 6 procedures — classified and unclassified together — of which 3 carry the registry's procedure-type tag "Bir mənbə" (single-source), a 50.0% share, worth 404,818 AZN combined.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Azerbaijan National Anti-Doping Agency (Azərbaycan Milli Antidopinq Agentliyi Publik Hüquqi Şəxs) |
| Window | Last 90 days (data cut 26 September 2026) |
| Total procedures (classified + unclassified) | 6 |
| Tagged "Bir mənbə" (single-source) | 3 |
| Single-source share | 50.0% |
| Single-source value, combined | 404,818 AZN |
What the number is not
This reading rests on a sample of six procedures over 90 days, so a share built on three tagged rows is a small base for a percentage: one procedure moving in or out of the count would shift the figure by roughly seventeen points. "Bir mənbə" is a registry free-text tag entered at submission, not a legal single-source designation that this pack has independently audited against the underlying circumstances. The 404,818 AZN figure sums the announced values recorded against the three tagged rows; it is not the agency's total procurement spend, not a signed contract value, and not money already paid — and in absolute terms it is a modest sum next to the multi-million-manat buyers AZTender profiles elsewhere.
Why it is a signal
- What circumstances under Azerbaijan's Public Procurement Law were cited for each of the 3 single-source designations?
- Does a 50.0% share persist if the window is widened, or is it an artefact of only 6 procedures being logged in 90 days?
- How does this 90-day count compare with the agency's own procurement volume in earlier periods?
- Were any of the 3 single-source procedures preceded by a competitive tender that drew no bids?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's buyer profile module builds this same procedure-type breakdown for any procuring entity, including smaller agencies where only a handful of procedures appear in a given window, and flags when a share is drawn from a small sample rather than a large one. A bidder scanning a sector for openings, or an auditor deciding which buyers merit a closer look, can pull the same profile instead of rebuilding it from raw registry exports. More detail is available at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. Single-source is a legitimate procedure category, not a legal characterisation of these six procedures, and no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or avoidance of competition is drawn from this share, particularly at this sample size.
