13.88 million manats, one award, two registry rows — Ağdam water and sewerage contract
AZTender's data cut of 12 November 2026 confirms one 13,884,075.57 AZN Ağdam water-and-sewerage award to T.T.Ş.-İnşaat, cross-checked against a second table after the cache showed it as two rows.
AZTender's data cut of 12 November 2026 (03:18 UTC) confirms a single, verified 13,884,075.57 AZN award for water-supply and sewerage construction in the Qərvənd and Eyvazxanbəyli villages of Ağdam district, made by the Directorate for Objects Under Construction ("Tikilməkdə Olan Obyektlərin Müdiriyyəti" Publik Hüquqi Şəxsi) to T.T.Ş.-İnşaat LLC ("T.T.Ş.-İNŞAAT" Məhdud Məsuliyyətli Cəmiyyəti). The initial cache scan showed this award as two separate rows — an announcement-only entry and a contract-dated entry, both carrying the identical amount and title; cross-checking the registry's raw tender table resolved the pair into one record with a genuine, verified contract date.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Directorate for Objects Under Construction ("Tikilməkdə Olan Obyektlərin Müdiriyyəti" PHŞ) |
| Supplier | T.T.Ş.-İnşaat LLC ("T.T.Ş.-İNŞAAT" MMC) |
| Project | Water supply and sewerage construction, Qərvənd and Eyvazxanbəyli villages, Ağdam district |
| Award amount | 13,884,075.57 AZN |
| Status | Awarded — contract record published |
| Verified contract date | 23 June 2026 |
What the number is not
This is not two separate 13.88 million manat awards: it is one contract that surfaced twice in the cache, once as an announcement-only record and once as a contract-dated record, both carrying the same amount and title — a duplicate-row pattern this pack caught and corrected by checking the registry's raw tender table for a genuine contract record. The 13.88 million figure is the announced/awarded price on the registry, not a confirmed disbursement; Azerbaijan's open data carries no payment or amendment table. A single award to one contractor for one project is not, by itself, evidence of wrongdoing, overpricing or favouritism.
Why it is a signal
- Did the 13,884,075.57 AZN award, contract-dated 23 June 2026, convert into work completed and payment made as recorded?
- What qualification criteria did the buyer publish for a water-and-sewerage contract of this size?
- How often does the announcement-and-contract duplication found here recur across other awards from the same directorate?
- Is a single award of this scale typical of this buyer's past procurement for Ağdam district, or unusual against its other contracts?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity-report module links an award's announcement row to its matching contract row, so a duplicate pair like this one — which a naive count would misread as two awards worth 27.77 million manats — surfaces as one reconciled record with a verified date instead. A bidder assessing reconstruction-sector work, or an auditor and journalist tracing one buyer's award history, can pull that reconciled record at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. A single verified award, corrected from an apparent duplicate, carries no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or overpricing.
