7 records, 4 single-source, 57.1% — a buyer profile for the Ağdam-Füzuli-Khojavend reconstruction agency
AZTender's 90-day buyer profile shows 4 of 7 procurement records (57.1%) at the Ağdam, Füzuli and Khojavend reconstruction agency tagged "Bir mənbə" (single-source); each of the seven awards went to a different supplier.
In AZTender's 90-day buyer profile, data cut dated 18 September 2026, the Reconstruction, Construction and Management Service for the Ağdam, Füzuli and Khojavend Districts (Ağdam, Füzuli və Xocavənd Rayonlarında Bərpa, Tikinti və İdarəetmə Xidməti Publik Hüquqi Şəxsi) recorded 7 procurement records in the last 90 days, of which 4 carry the registry's procedure-type tag "Bir mənbə" (single-source) — 57.1% of the seven; one more is tagged "Kotirovka" (price quotation) and two carry no procedure-type tag at all. All seven awards in the same window went to seven different suppliers, with amounts ranging from 3,393.00 AZN to 620,703.88 AZN, and no supplier won more than once.
The numbers
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Buyer | Reconstruction, Construction and Management Service for the Ağdam, Füzuli and Khojavend Districts |
| Window | Last 90 days (data cut 18 September 2026) |
| Procurement records | 7 (4 "Bir mənbə", 1 "Kotirovka", 2 untagged) |
| Tagged "Bir mənbə" (single-source) | 4 (57.1%) |
| Distinct suppliers, one award each | 7 |
| Award range | 3,393.00 AZN to 620,703.88 AZN |
What the number is not
The 57.1% share is not a share of classified rows only: the denominator is the seven procurement records this buyer has in the 90-day window; two of them carry no procedure-type tag, so the share describes how the registry classified them, not every procurement action the agency took. It is not a bidder-count claim — no bid-level data exists in Azerbaijan's open procurement registry. And unlike other buyer profiles in this series, it is not a supplier-concentration finding: none of the seven winners repeats, so the single-source share describes how procedures were classified, not which company benefited most.
Why it is a signal
- What circumstances under Azerbaijan's Public Procurement Law were cited for each of the 4 single-source designations?
- Does the 57.1% share hold over a longer window than 90 days, or is it specific to this period?
- Why does a buyer managing reconstruction across three districts show no repeat supplier across all seven awards?
- Was the window's largest award, 620,703.88 AZN, which carries no procedure-type tag in the registry, preceded by a competitive process?
- How does this agency's share compare with other liberated-territory reconstruction and management buyers once more of them are profiled?
What AZTender shows
AZTender's entity reports build this procedure-type breakdown for any procuring entity, with the buyer profile as one view within it, tracking how the mix of open tenders, restricted procedures and single-source awards moves over time and flagging whether any supplier repeats within it. A bidder scanning reconstruction-sector buyers, or an auditor screening for a closer look, can pull the same profile instead of rebuilding it from raw registry exports. More detail is available at aztender.ai.
A signal is not a verdict. Single-source is a legitimate procedure category, not a legal characterisation of any of the seven records here, and no conclusion about wrongdoing, affiliation or avoidance of competition is drawn from this share or from the absence of a repeat supplier.
